web analytics

Conventional

The Star reported this month its president and publisher, John Humenik, is off to greener and colder pastures, being named by Lee Enterprises to take charge of the Wisconsin State Journal and other area papers. Humenik came to Tucson in 2005. A Lee executive said of Humenik’s Tucson reign:

“With John’s leadership, the Arizona Daily Star has delivered outstanding results in every aspect of our business — from magnificent journalism and service to the community to powerful results for advertisers — leading to rapid audience growth and impressive financial performance.”

The statement might be true.

Under Humenik, classified ads disappeared, which was/is an industry-wide sad fact. Some of the Star’s news sections disappeared, the Accent section, a feature section. The Sunday TV listings was removed from the paper and sold as a separate item. The local news section, “metro and region” makes an appearance but once a week on Sundays. And those cutbacks reflected an aggressive cutting of both news staff and newsprint use, the two greatest costs of newspaper production.

During Humenik’s watch, Tucson Newspapers enticed the grocery stores to move their advertising from direct mail to the newspaper. Back in the day, grocery stores grew irritable at newspaper pricing because of constant increases and arrogant attitudes. That was before the bottom fell out. The grocery stores have returned. Fry’s ads seem to dominate. The use of the gate-fold wrappers that cover the first news section and often the Sports section may annoy readers, but the advertisers just love it. It is a rare day indeed that Star readers don’t have to  struggle to remove the gate-fold wrapper from the Front Page. The gate-fold is that flap of newsprint on the front. In addition to Fry’s, Jim Click sells cars, Jack Furrier sells tires using the gate fold.

While I suspect Humenik had nothing in particular to do with it, companies that sell stuff to an aging America have gravitated to newsprint newspaper advertising. Hence, the impressively depressing flood of hearing-aids, residential retirement  and assisted living developments and, of course, the toothless full page ads for dental implants. The spirit of Walter Brennan lives in those ads.

But the statement concerning “rapid audience growth” requires some further explantion, expansion, and elucidation. There very likely was and has been online audience growth. But for the newsprint version of the Star, the one that lands on doorsteps and becomes fishwrap, there’s been a decline.

The year-end 10-K report filed in 2004 by Pulitzer Inc., which owned the Star at the time, said the Star’s print circulation was 106,618 daily and about 62k greater on Sunday. This would be just before Humenik landed at the Star. Today, as he leaves the Star eight years later, the daily print circulation is 77,547, Sunday’s circulation is 123,162; this is according to the latest 10-k report, which was released on December 13. This represents a drop of 29,071 or 27.3 percent during Humanik’s watch.

The trend is accelerating:

                       2004                           2006               2012               2013

Daily             106,618                     104,731         82,305           77,547

Sunday         168,000                     156,694         133,558         123,162

Daily Circulation dropped 5k from last year to this; Sunday circulation dipped by 10k. If ever there was a no confidence vote, this is it.

This is not all of the story. In 2009, the Tucson Citizen ceased publication. In 2004, the combined daily circulation of the Star and Citizen was more than 138k. When advertisers bought ads, they appeared in both papers. This is because in terms of economics the papers were partners, operating under a joint operating agreement (JOA) sanctified by Congress in what should be regarded in hindsight laughingly as The Newspaper Preservation Act (1971).

This was in effect a monopoly that would have violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act if the newspaper industry — already heavily anointed with privilege and approbation by the Founding Fathers in the First Amendment — had not been exempted. The Congress passed the exemption based on the logic that communities benefitted from having two newspaper voices. Thus, the newsrooms were to be maintained separately while the sales, distribution and production costs were shared according to some formula. In Tucson, the partners split profit and cost 50-50.

JOAs, however noble in intent, present enormous barriers to newspaper competition. But if one of the JOA papers nonetheless goes out of business, there is no residual notion of preserving two voices. The Citizen went kaput. But its owner, the Gannett Co., still retains half the profit and expense, as per a contractual agreement. As for the Citizen’s voice, it is but a faint, online squeak.

The point of this digression is to emphasize that the Citizen’s sad demise did not translate into additional circulation for the Star. More than 30,000 former Citizen subscribers decided to do without a newspaper rather than subscribe to the Star.

The Star’s circulation decreases reflect a sharp decline in Lee’s financial health, which at this point is rickety. The decline of its stock value has been widely reported along with the supposedly generous compensation awarded its top boss Mary Junck. The effect of the huge burden of debt the company acquired when it bought Pulitzer Inc. in 2005 has not been well reported because it is difficult to understand.

Some of the provisions of the interest payments evolved around Libor, which stands for the London Interbank Offered Rate. This is the rate banks charge for money. There is currently a scandal widely unreported in the United States, but duly noted in Great Britain, that Libor rates were manipulated by various agents. Here is what Lee says in the 10k is its exposure to those Libor rates (The language is allegedly English):

“Our debt structure and interest rate risk are managed through the use of fixed and floating rate debt. Our primary exposure is to LIBOR. A 100 basis point increase or decrease to LIBOR would, if in excess of LIBOR minimums discussed more fully below, decrease or increase, respectively, income before income taxes on an annualized basis by approximately $6,095,000 , based on $609,500,000 of floating rate debt outstanding at September 29, 2013.

“Our debt under the 1st Lien Agreement is subject to minimum interest rate levels of 1.25%. Based on the difference between interest rates in December 2013 and our 1.25% minimum rate, LIBOR would need to increase approximately 91 basis points for six month borrowing up to approximately 109 basis points for one month borrowing before our borrowing cost would begin to be impacted by an increase in interest rates.

“At September 29, 2013 , approximately 71.9% of the principal amount of our debt is subject to floating interest rates. We regularly evaluate alternatives to hedge the related interest rate risk.”

The 10k notes that Lee still owes more than half the money it borrowed to finance the purchase of Pulitzer Inc. Lee paid $64 per share to acquire Pulitzer, which has to be one of the luckiest sales in the history of the industry and certainly makes Michael Pulitzer a financial genius. And on the other hand, Lee’s CEO Mary Junck looks like one of P.T. Barnum’s born-everyday suckers. She continues to be well-paid for her colossal error and many consistently unsuccessful efforts to reverse the company’s continuing financial misfortune.

Junck’s company shelled out $89,477,000 in interest expense in 2013. Since 2009, Lee has listed $363,763,000 in interest expense. This current 10k report states that Lee owes $847,500,000 in principal and is obligated to pay $208,788,000 in interest. This amounts to a bit more than $1 billion. Lee bought Pulitzer for $1.46 billion eight years ago. The debt burden combined with the huge drop in revenue offers no room to maneuver.

The first thought is that perhaps Junck & Co should sell off assets to pay back debt. It did sell its Hawaii paper and another in Escondido, Calif. It made some money and lost some. But if the company sells its assets it also decreases its revenue flow.

The company may find a way out of the morass created by Junck & Co. But the possibility is that it might not. And the company admits it in a section devoted to risk factors: “We May Have Insufficient Earnings Or Liquidity To Meet Our Future Debt Obligations.”

Lee likes to tout the fact that it operates in noncompetitive markets. But it is not gaining circulation because it cannot figure a way to create a better product with fewer resources. Lee is a conventional corporation that happens to own media products. Its attitude toward its products — newspapers — is about the same as Proctor & Gamble’s attitude toward its products. Stuff is stuff, and selling one thing is about the same as selling another. Lee has a long list of personnel on its management team. They are in charge of stuff like finance, strategy, human resources, same stuff as P&G; soap or newspapers, same stuff.

But news is not a conventional product. It is not, for example, subject to the law of supply and demand, at least not in the conventional sense. And good news is not the same as a good story. Bad stories can be good stories maladroitly rendered — badly written, incompletely reported, badly edited, misplayed and misunderstood — rather than a bad soap bar. Marketing 101 doesn’t account for these differences. In fact, you might ask whether Yellow Journalism was the first instance of what we now call mass marketing. If so, it’s worth remembering that the practice was pioneered by newspaper editors less interested in money and much more preoccupied with attracting readers by running hot-stuff stories. This was long before Marketing 101 ever poked its nose into a business school curriculum.

The best illustration of this difference is in “City Editor,” a book published in 1934 by Stanley Walker, the city editor of the New York Herald Tribune. Here Walker explains the city editor’s job: He notes that, “the city editor has one of the best jobs which journalism has to offer. He can mar his paper, or help make it great. There are dull stretches, but usually there is not time to do all the things that cry for doing. The job is run by organization, but it must be, in some aspects, unconventional, for news itself is unconventional.”

In my career as an editor, I found it best to be conventional, to follow the generally accepted ways of newspaper management, do the expected thing, go along, get along. I worked for a family paper for a while in which journalism was kept upper most in mind. Then it became a corporation, where the requirement was to put profit first. I had some moments when I might swerve off the conventional path, but not so anyone would much notice or care. I would have invited big trouble if I had been consistently unconventional. I cannot actually define “unconventional” as it relates to news as in, “that’s a good story.” It’s a lot like Potter Stewart, the Supreme Court justice who said he could not define obscenity, but knew it when he saw it. It certainly consists of more than “man bites dog.” I think a newspaper could attract a great following in these dismal newspaper days, but only if it were led by a latter-day Charles Dana or Joseph Pulitzer. He or she would have to have the dedication and the power to run a paper against all convention.

While I also can’t really say what it might mean to be unconventional, I have run into one sterling description of the sort of newspaper that once drew  readers by the thousands. Ben Hecht’s autobiography, “A Child of the Century,” published in 1954, contains this superb passage:

“There was Arthur James Pegler, the salty and verbally crackling father of Westbrook, the mighty columnist-to-be. Pegler, pere, was the inventor of the blood-and-thunder rhetoric which became known as the Hearst newswriting style. He wrote once, in a magazine tale, a description of the thing he helped create: ‘A Hearst newspaper is like a screaming woman running down the street with her throat cut.’ ”

Definitely beyond Marketing 101. And anything John Humenik would mess with.

 

A Streetcar Named FUBAR

copy-header1.jpgIt’s hard to believe how dysfunctional the Tucson Mayor and Council are. They whine and whimper until hell won’t have it. It’s embarrassing. And it’s impossible to picture a more pathetic spectacle than elected officials declaring absolute impotence.

Tucson’s city government was created in the 1920s during the era of goody-two-shoes morons who assumed that professional managers were better than politicians. That was OK for a two-bit, cow-town burg that Tucson was for so many years. But today the weak mayor and strong city manager form embodied in the Tucson City Charter is wholly inadequate for a major metropolis.  It is a city of potholes and incompetent governance.

Take, for example, the water tax that continued for three years because the staff failed to tell the elected officials that it was still on. The city imposed what is called a tax on water users, but technically was a fee. It was supposed to have a limited run. But it is still in place after three years. The council didn’t know. Who knew? Who’s on first? This is not city government. It’s Abbot and Costello.

City Councilman Paul Cunningham was offended. As quoted in the Arizona Daily Star: “Why have a City Council when no matter what we decide, staff does whatever they want? The tax may be justified, but that’s not the point. The council wasn’t given the final say.”

The council “wasn’t given the final say.” That’s a sad statement indeed. Whose “say” was it? The staff’s, the city manager’s? Why of course. In the first place, the only full time elected official is the mayor and he’s paid diddley squat. The council members are paid a pittance to sit around and twiddle thumbs.

Might as well because the city staff has the elected alleged politicians by the short hairs. Here’s the evidence, an alleged explanation from Kelly Gottschalk, the city’s chief financial officer, again as per the Star:

“The total budget is $1.3 billion dollars and very complicated. Given the context of the overall size, complexity and ongoing challenge to continually respond year after year to budget deficits, the in-lieu sunset language in a prior year motion was not forward in the minds of staff.” The story also said that Gottschalk said “while no requirement exists that the item be approved other than what was done each year, the staff could have reminded the council of the motion regarding the sunset.

You won’t find a bigger load of rubbish in the nearest land fill. The horse pucky is sky high in the city manager Richard Miranda’s office. Here is the crock of untreated sewage Miranda offered as reported in the Star:

“There are expectations that we provide the mayor and the council with the best information available to allow them to make informed decisions. We are doing everything we can to meet this expectation.”

If that is everything the city manager’s office can do, seems clear the city needs a new city manager. No that won’t work. The city needs a strong mayor structure, the kind where pettifogging bureaucrats get their arses kicked from here to Tuesday when they don’t keep stuff “forward” in their alleged minds.

The howling city bureaucratic stupidity, however involves the streetcar named FUBAR. Earlier this month the Star reported that the city needed $13 million it didn’t have to finance its trolley system.

But not to worry, the city will borrow the money. Here’s city council member Steve Kozachik as reported in the Star:

“For the last two years, we’ve been told that the project is on time and in budget. And I’ve been saying neither is true. The cars are late and now we’re told that we have a significant funding gap. It’d be nice if staff would start telling us straight so people can believe what they hear when it’s coming from the mouths of government officials.”

But it’s just $13 million short. Andrew Quigley, Tucson’s Sunlink co-manager, told the Star that the $13 million shortfall shows how smart and effective the planning for the project was because the cost overrun was only half of what they thought it would be.

This is absurd. Congratulations, you are a fool.

Of Typewriters and Time

cropped-old-typewriter.jpgNoisy Typewriter is software that makes the sound of a typewriter when you hit computer keys. It produces a comforting clack. When you hit the backspace key, it makes the sound the typewriter would make, sort of an errrt. When you hit the tab for a paragraph, you get a ding just like returning the carriage. When you hit the arrow key up or down, you hear the sound of the roller as though you were loading paper.

I love this program. In fact, from time to time, it stops working, sort of decides to go outside for a smoke. Or I have turned down the computer’s speaker volume. In any event, silent running is now unsettling. But it’s easy enough to coax it back to clack.

It took only a short time for me to become addicted to the sound of the keys banging. It’s a DNA thing. My writing life started with the typewriter. I started composing with the typewriter rather than a pen. I did not realize how much I missed the sound. The only analogy I can think of is comfort food. It’s like having grown up having meat loaf once a week. Then for like 30 years you go without meat loaf. Then suddenly, it’s there on your plate. You don’t eat so much as devour.

The typewriter sounds spark all manner of nostalgia, particularly of the newsroom and the machine I used, an Underwood from the 30s or 40s. It had many a user. From what it weighed, I figure the metal could be melted down for a Volkswagen.

I was obsessive about gunk in the keys. I wanted crisply struck letters. I also wanted to procrastinate. I felt I had to rid my copy of ink-filled “o”s and “e”s. The “e” was a serious problem. I used chemicals to clean the keys, which spread with a toothbrush. Later, there was a gummy ball of clay-like material that would clean the keys. It was a ritual. At least I did not invoke  incantations or mantras.

I was also obsessive about my glue pot. The paper bought rubber cement by the gallon. The glue was poured into plastic jars. The  jar top was attached to a shaft with the brush at the end. You used the glue to attach sheets of copy paper. One story thus could have several sheets of copy paper — this is newsprint cut to size that was somewhere in between regular eight and half by eleven and legal size. The advantage in gluing pages was in the fact they didn’t get lost.

When rubber cement is exposed to air long enough, it hardens. This is a bad business. Some reporters took advantage of this characteristic and rolled gobs of glue into balls and used them as projectiles.

The daytime shift was usually 9 to 6, and at the end of the day, there were 20 or 30 typewriters giving full voice to the orchestra, writers hunched over their instruments — except for AJM. He never looked at the copy he was writing. He raised his head high as though he were Horowitz at Carnegie Hall, turning his head left and then right, swaying to a music only he could hear. His copy, however, left much to be desired, and the last I heard he was working at a Circle K. He was not the first such newspaperman to wind up tending a Circle K, and for a while I wondered if that was where all of us would wind up eventually. In those days, you didn’t take much of a pay cut when you landed behind a Circle K cash register.

Just to round out this little nostalgia waltz, I want to point out that I still have the pica pole first given to me when I started at the Star in 1971. My name is engraved on it. This was done by Swanee — one Porter Swanson — the Star’s librarian, a very nice man with many fine qualities, none of which, I suspect, included library skills. I also have my scissors from the time, a pair of exquisite shiny chrome with an edge that has held for 40 years.

Finally, I must mention the reporter’s desk. This is a custom I have preserved in old age. I am amazed at the amount and quality of flotsam that unconscious hands seem to broadcast on my desk. At least I do not eat over my keyboard. I recall vividly an editor one early morning in the newsroom using a full-sized vacuum cleaner with hose to extract what must have been a ten-year collection of bits of  pizza, sandwiches, hot dogs, Pepsi, coffee, tea leaves, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Jack’s Barbecue from the keyboard of a recently departed reporter. It took her much longer than she would have liked.

One reporter, DW, who was both dyslexic and a slob, was famous for her desk. The janitorial staff was directed not to clean reporter desks because there might be precious material buried among the three-week old newspapers, scraps of paper, tin foil and doggy bags. I know of no Pulitzer Prize that was buried in garbage. Nonetheless reporter detritus was allowed to accumulate on desks. This consisted mostly of pizza boxes, scattered rather than stacked, and containing gobs of now-hard cheese, sausage and pepperoni. In between the pizza boxes were square Chinese take out boxes, half filled with fried rice, moo-shoo pork and kung-pao chicken. The desk itself was known as D’s landfill. Sometimes an editor with authority would leave her a note to clean up her desk top. She threw these away, muttering to herself that she possessed no desk pot.

I have seen many newsrooms, and they are typically in great disarray. Some reporters, of course, are worse than others. But the most startling newsroom I ever saw was in Fort Lauderdale at the Sun-Sentinel. Every desktop was clean. As a whistle. There were no newspapers, no pencils, no nothing. I asked my guide if this was an insurance office rather than a newspaper. He said the publisher had ordered all reporters to clear their desks or be fired. I could only shake my head. It was just one more piece of evidence to add to the great pile I had collected over the years and had led me to the unshakable conclusion that newspaper publishers of my time, with rare exceptions, were a brain-dead life form.

_________________________

From Bunny Fontana:

I taught myself to type on a Remington standard when I was still in elementary school: three fingers and a thumb at a time.  That’s the way I type today.  I never learned the keyboard and still couldn’t type blindfolded.  But I can whack out about 70 wpm.  And have whacked out millions of words over the years.
Hazel used a typewriter almost to her dying day.  She never touched a computer.  She had her typewriter mounted to a board attached to the handle bars of her stationery bicycle, and typed letters to family members as she pedaled away.
They were wonderful machines, bells, black-and-red ribbons, and all!
Thanks for the memories.  B.

_________________________

From Adolfo Quezada:

This post prompted a lot of memories of the Citizen newsroom in the 70’s . Funny, sad, I miss some of it.
Adolfo

And Now the Navy Yard


We are a remarkable nation if for nothing else in our boundless tolerance for murder and mayhem.

This insanity knows no bounds. There was New Town, And Columbine. And the Dark Night murders. We had Tucson. And do not forget Virginia Tech. Or Fort Hood. Now we have the Navy Yard. Twelve killed, just  like that.

We hear. We watch. We weep. The shrines go up. The bodies are buried.

And Washington does not give a shit.

The memorial services commence, the president leads the mourning. Voices echo throughout the hinterland. The calls, the pleas, the begging for gun control rise like ghosts on the haunt.

Washington does not give a shit.

The nation grieves without anger. We see no gore, no photos of the dead lying in pools of blood, bodies splayed and curled, the lifeless faces robbed of the future.

There are more guns and gun deaths in the United States than any other country in the world. We are a country meek and mild in the face of constant murder. We should be furious. But there is no rage, just a meek and mild populace insanely content to tolerate the insanity of mass murder and millions of guns.

No wonder Washington does not give a shit.

Padre OMO and Trixie

I worked for many years writing and editing editorials at the (Tucson) Arizona Daily Star with Tom Turner. His work brought the Star as close as we could get to the Pulitzer Prize: One year his editorials on water conservation made the judges’ short list.

We wrote this parody after realizing that some columnists kept scratching for a certain tone and feeling in their columns. We wrote this for our own amusement. It has never been published. Tom is retired and lives in San Diego. He is the author of “Soldier Boys,” a novel, available through Amazon.

 

ON THE STREETS

An editorial column

By PETE BRESLIN EARTHY

 

THE DOCKS — The last time I saw him he was throwing chairs and smashing a bloodied fist into the faces of all comers with an explosiveness that split their lips, popped their teeth and pulverized their noses. He was depressed.

But Sunday mass was like that. It was the only way to get his message of love through to this parish of leather-faced dockworkers.

That was 30 years ago, when rotgut and I were friends and we all wore the look of the slums. We were poor. But we knew how to survive. With guts.

And Father Timothy O’Shaughnessy McGuire O’Rourk had more guts  than any of us. He was known on the docks as “Padre OMO,” and when Padre OMO said, “Kneel!”, you asked only, “For how long, Padre OMO?” He had a way with words. And an even more persuasive left hook.

But even Padre OMO, who wore the face of the docks, could miss the boat. And he did. He missed women’s lib — and he was not ready for Trixie Malloy. When it was finished, Trixie Malloy, with her look of scarlet, did him in.

Trixie was the first of the long-shore broads. She was a descendant of Tugboat Annie, born on a dark and stormy night in the bowels of a barge on Murky Bay. She had red hair that flowed down over smooth, muscular shoulders, green eyes that cut fog, a narrow waist and long, slim legs — and a chest that bulged the bib of her overalls. Lead anchors hung from her long, pierced earlobes. Any man who got too close rank the risk of getting his throat cut with a quick jerk of Trixie’s head.

Padre OMO grabbed the neck of the whiskey bottle and stood it on end. His Adam’s apple bobbed as the rotgut reddened his face stilled the volcano is in his belly.

“Salud a todo el mundo!”, he exclaimed as he hurled the bottle against the wall. “It was the overalls,” he reflected, “I had to see what was inside.

“At first it was good,” he said. “I left the church and she left the docks.” But it wasn’t good for long. Trixie had been to Boston. She was beat up and burned out from a hard-hearted and bloodied effort to unionize professional anchovy filleters there. She had failed, and Trixie was tired and ready to leave the East for the golden West.

When she left Padre OMO, he thought of her dressed in a pinafore jumpsuit, standing at the kitchen stove, basting eggs. She made her way slowly cross-country with a group of over-the-hill roustabouts, shoring up their tents and their spirits with her strength.

She had charm. She could sing. She could dance. But most of all, Trixie could play chess. She moved in with Bobby Fischer, then Viktor Korchnoi. Fischer was too erratic, always a sucker for the Vienna Gambit — first used by U.S. Grant in a drunken stupor while fighting the Battle of Lower Chicamaugua and Upper Chancellorsville.

Korchnoi was her complaint. It infuriated her that he always led with queen’s pawn-2. It was maddening, but Korchnoi, complaints notwithstanding, held her attention. Each time, she tried to leave, he would show her the Russian End-Around Gambit, named after one of Nijinky’s moves.

It lasted until Korchnoi’s complaint got out of hand, and he beat her with a queen’s rook. Checkmate. It was then she discovered rodeo and Chico Hernandez Alfonso Smith. She moved in with a rodeo bull rider.

That was when Padre OMO made his move. The rodeo was playing Madison Square Garden. Padre OMO made his way to the dressing room when the bull riding was over. But Chico, who wore the look of the bull, pounded Padre OMO’s face. Padre OMO wore the look of hamburger.

“I guess,” said Padre OMO, taking a slug from a fresh bottle, “that’s why I’m telling you all this. You’re the greatest bull-slinger in all New York.”

I roam the Big Apple for stories like Padre OMO’s and Trixie’s. But I do not wear the look of the docks. I prefer corduroy.

 

A robust, life-enhancing EVENT

There was a time in this country when retailers held “sales.” There are no more “sales.” There are “events.” I do not know where the sales went, possibly to visit grandma and got eaten by a big bad wolf. I believe it happened at about the same time “robust” replaced “strong” and “improve” gave way to “enhance.”

It offends my ears to see “Labor Day Event” in a newspaper or television ad. It sounds like the reference should be to a track meet. I have robust objections to such abusive language. The language could be greatly enhanced if fewer euphemisms were used by advertisers. I might even find closure. And why, “find closure”? It’s not as though I lost it. Moreover,   if there is closure, was it preceded by openure? Surely openure precedes closure just as cases opened are then closed, thus resulting in open and closure cases, which were once open and shut. But one cannot find closure when already shut. That would be “shuture,” as in shuture face.

There once was a very good word used before “closure” reared its offensive head. It was used well and often, with resolve and often with resolution. If only we could return to those golden days of yesteryear. Or is it yesterure?

Blow out

Grant Road killed a tire this week. It was mine.

Now it’s gone, the victim of a pothole the size of East Texas. Poor thing never had a chance. It went WHUMP! Then KERFLEWEY. She blew.

I would like to know how the town ranks in per capita tire sales. I’d bet it tops the list.

Be careful. Grant Road is not the only tire killer in this town.

Tires today, axels tomorrow.

The unglory of the Washington Post

How is it that the Washington Post was worth three times the Boston Globe? That is, the Post sells for $250 mil, and the Globe for $70 mil. Or are the Sulzbergers just chimps rather than publishers? Granted, you often need a program to tell the difference, but really, what gives?

Why would an otherwise sensible person like Bezos want the Post?

And, finally, let’s hear it for Donald Graham. He should cash the check quick before his Bradlee explodes and he gets his tit caught in a ringer. On second thought, that could never happen to Donald. His mother had all the balls in that family.

Everett S. Allen: Great White Father of Iambic Journalism

Everett S. Allen of The Standard Times, New Bedford, Mass.

Everett S. Allen once wrote a lead for his paper, The Standard-Times of New Bedford, Mass., in iambic pentameter. You don’t typically find poets writing news copy. But he was unusual from the start. Even in his later years, he sported a dazzling head of  shoulder-length curly white hair, flaring mutton chops and sailor’s craggy face, looking for all the word as he had just stepped out of 1968 and the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco. It was for this reason that Roy Peter Clark called him the Great White Father of Iambic Journalism.

He won the first column-writing competition sponsored by the American Society of Newspaper Editors in 1979. When I read these magnificent pieces, I sought to put his work in The Arizona Daily Star. I called him to see if I could buy the column. The column was not available through major newspaper syndicates. In fact, he said, his column appeared only in The Standard Times and the Raleigh News and Observer. I asked if he would send us a third copy, and we agreed on the price: $15 per column.

The column appeared Sundays. No other than the three newspapers ran his column. We spoke often by phone and finally met at conference in New England. He wrote twice as long as most columnists, about 1,500 words. He was certainly worth the space. Four of his books are still available and listed here along with a biography.

The columns here from the ASNE competition are in pdf format. Just click on the link.

AllenEv

 

William R. Mathews, the Star’s curmudgeon editor and gifted editorial writer

Mathews plaque

The Arizona Daily Star today (Nov. 22) ran an editorial (read it here) that first was published on Thanksgiving Day (Nov. 23) 1961. The newspaper did not say who the writer was, but I think I recognize the direct clarity of style and thought as being that of William R. Mathews.

Mathews was a professional curmudgeon, otherwise engaged as editor and publisher of The Arizona Daily Star from 1930 until his death in 1969. It was said one could not get elected dog catcher without Mathews’ approval.

It might have been true. He played politics full time, locally, statewide and on a national basis. He seemed to have a direct pipeline to the State Department. He predicted the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor two weeks before it happened. He was aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo harbor when the Japanese surrendered.

He was a gifted writer as the editorial shows. It surprises me that he was so good. He also was incredibly productive; his editorials appeared everyday even when he traveled so extensively. I imagine he never dreamed he would write editorials for a living.

Mathews fought in the Great War, and was a hero, capturing Germans and winning the Croix de Guerre. He was the business manager of a Santa Barbara newspaper when fate beckoned, and he accepted a position at the Star for 2 percent ownership. In return for the small interest in the paper, Mathews was to watch over the paper’s business affairs, a sort of ballast to Ralph Ellinwood who was editor by virtue of the fact his father bought the paper for him. His father, E. E. Ellinwood, was an attorney for Phelps Dodge.

Medical School entrance

Ralph Ellinwood was by all accounts a good editor. He was a graduate of Columbia’s School of Journalism and had worked for the Sacramento Union. He, too, had fought in World War I and spent time in a German prison camp. Ellinwood died young in 1930 after only a few years in charge of the Star. Ownership fell to Ellinwood’s widow, Clare, and Mathews. He ran the editorial operations. Mrs. Ellinwood played a part in management.

There’s very little to commemorate Mathews’ contribution to the city. There’s a small plaque with his bust in relief outside the entrance to the UA School of Medicine. He was the driving force behind the UA medical school, having campaigned personally and in print to bring it here.

Mathews carried out Ralph Ellinwood’s desire to establish the liberal tone to the Star’s editorials. Thus he is among the first to blame for the Star’s alleged reputation as The Red Star.