The one thing I remember from “Route 66,” the TV series, was this moment when Tod turns the ignition key of the Corvette and it roars. I remember the sense of being engulfed by envy. I — along with a gazillion other 14-year-old adolescents — could not imagine anything could beat that for cool.

The thought came back with the news that Martin Milner, who played Tod, died Sunday at the age of 83. He and his sidekick Buzz — played, or rather overplayed, by George Maharis — were characters created by the legendary screenwriter Stirling Silliphant whose work still holds up after all these years. He died in 1993.

I remember one episode in particular where Tod and Buzz get jobs working on the construction of a dam. The entire episode was shot in Page and during the construction of the Glen Canyon Dam.

In its time, Route 66 was the best thing on television. It embodied all the best of the American road trip. The theme was written by Nelson Riddle, a great tune that worked perfectly as shown right here.

Harper’s September issue is very much wanting.

The lead piece is by some bloke who taught at an “elite” university. He argues that that Higher Ed has sold out to money interests. He pays no attention to state universities. The life is being choked out of them by state legislatures run by extremely small-minded people that belong to a particular political party. Thus, state universities now hire “development officers,” unknown 30 or 40 years ago. “Development” in this context means beating about the bushes for loose moolah. The state universities haven’t sold their souls. They’ve been turned out on the street to beg money from corporate bigwigs and generous (meaning rich) people and foundations.

Harper’s also has a piece on how dangerous Karachi is. I certainly will cancel my reservation and stay away. There’s also a piece on the “war” against invasive species, truly a subject of lesser moment.

But then there’s the Index. This is not even at the topof the list: The Index says that the number of confirmed living Americans who are 112 years of age is 10. Then it provides the number of living people of that same age “on the Social Security rolls: 4,700,000.”

Let us now toast long life and amazing (Harper’s) facts that are never explained.

Anyone else a little curious about the unconfirmed 4,699,990 Americans who are allegedly 112 years old? Wonder how much money they are collecting.

What a country.

A headline from the mourning (cq) paper:

“Reclusive Taliban leader dead

since ’13, Afghan agency says”

Can’t get more reclusive than that.

It is not insignificant that when Caitlyn Jenner spoke in public last week, she spoke to a room full of jocks. Jocks like herself. The best, the champs, the stars, the MVPs. The unchallenged A-side of the American cafeteria, on another night they are lavished like royalty. Those ESPY Awards? That’s an intimidating crowd. Just watching at home on TV, I feel there’s at least a 20% chance I will get stuffed into a locker.

Let’s be honest: Sports can be a brilliant catalyst for social progress—it happened with Jesse Owens, Jackie Robinson, Billie Jean King and Magic Johnson, among many others, and its crucial lessons of sacrifice and teamwork can ballast a lifetime—but sports can be a backward place, too. Antisocial. Mean-spirited. Bullying. A sports section in 2015 veers between episodes of greatness and plunges of arrested development. The other day a pair of New Jersey fathers were arrested for having a bloody fight at their daughters’ travel softball game.

I mean, you have got to be kidding me. Grown dads.

Caitlyn Jenner’s speech Wednesday night in Los Angeles? This was rarer, bigger stuff. Sports in service of a larger idea. It might not have been meaningful to everyone, but that’s OK. It didn’t have to be meaningful to everyone. That wasn’t really the point.

There was some aggro howling about ESPN’s decision to give its Arthur Ashe Courage Award to Jenner, to which the only reasonable response is: give me a giant break. I never thought I would live to see the day when an ESPY was treated like a Fields Medal, or a Guggenheim Fellowship. Jenner’s award was contrived? You don’t say. Virtually every public awards ceremony is a contrivance—Louis B. Mayer admitted the Academy Awards were at least partly launched as a way to kiss up to filmmakers (“If I got them cups and awards they’d kill themselves to produce what I wanted,” Meyer is quoted saying in Scott Eyman’s “Lion of Hollywood”). The ESPYs are designed by a powerful sports network to entertain and relationship-build and to fill the humid doldrums between basketball and football. Over the years there have been genuine, stirring moments—cancer-diagnosed college basketball coach Jim Valvano’s impassioned plea in 1993 to “don’t ever give up,” and the late ESPN anchor Stuart Scott’s poignant speech last year in receipt of an award named for Valvano. But mostly the ESPYs are showbiz, a chance to watch athletes try to laugh at themselves and see how many Gronkowskis can climb out of a party bus.

Naturally, as if on cue, there was a tide of Internet misinformation about Jenner’s selection—a common meme was that ESPN had passed over a deserving military war hero in order to honor Jenner, or had chosen Jenner over the late Lauren Hill, a college basketball player who had managed to play a final game despite a terminal brain cancer diagnosis. This was untrue—Jenner had upset no one’s specific bid for the Ashe award, and the inspirational Hill was honored elsewhere in the evening. Meanwhile, it was ugly how free some Jenner/ESPN critics felt to torque the legacy of Ashe, a groundbreaking athlete who led a life of extraordinary grace and compassion. Ashe’s own daughter, Camera, applauded the selection of Jenner. “She is the epitome of courage,” she told the New York Daily News.

Backlash was expected, of course. Those willful misrepresentations exposed the intertwined currents of antipathy and ignorance surrounding Jenner’s story. This was not going to be easy.

And yet here’s the thing: Jenner got up there on stage in Los Angeles and made it look easy. Even if it was not. Even if she said “this transition has been harder on me than anything I could imagine,” a sober reminder of an experience not uncommon to her. Jenner spoke about a transgender teenager, Sam Taub, who had not long ago taken his life. Another, Mercedes Williamson, found stabbed to death in Mississippi.

It was a tough speech to a tougher room, but Jenner crushed it. “I’m clear with my responsibility going forward—to tell my story the right way, for me to keep learning, to reshape the landscape of how trans issues are viewed, how trans people are treated,” she said. “And then more broadly to promote a very simple idea: accepting people for who they are. Accepting people’s differences.”

It is very rare in American life you can actually hear the wheels of the culture grind forward in real time. But that’s what was happening here. Sports prefers to stick with archetypes—matinee idol quarterbacks, underappreciated linemen, stoic coaches, flaky pitchers. Jenner herself fit neatly into a formula: Olympic champion, symbol of American excellence, flag-draped icon from the 1976 Montreal Games. But every so often an athlete arrives with the power to change the status quo, because the athlete is undeniable. That’s what made this powerful. Jenner’s not an outsider. She is in the club.

She is also, by her own admission, flawed—that Vanity Fair cover story is unvarnished about Jenner’s past shortcomings as a husband and a father. But in her speech, Jenner made it very clear: She is suited for this moment. People may find her comfort in the spotlight off-putting or dislike that she’s doing a reality-TV show or cringe at the narcissism empire built by the Kardashian clan, but this role she is assuming in the mainstream? Not for a person who shrinks. “If you want to call me names, make jokes, doubt my intentions, go ahead, because the reality is, I can take it,” she said, reminding the audience she was the MVP of her high-school football team (perfect). “But for the thousands of kids out there coming to terms with being true to who they are, they shouldn’t have to take it.”

Jenner’s OK with all of the noise. With the ignorance. With, frankly, the hate (if you spend hours rattling around the Internet writing crude things about Jenner, it’s time to go take a long, contemplative walk in the forest). She’s OK with the people who say they’re fine with Jenner but just don’t want her story “in their face,” which intentionally or not, is a position that tacitly denies a person their right to live a visible and recognized life. She’s OK with the ludicrous accusation that attention to Jenner takes away from other deserving sports stories—nobody’s talking less about the amazing Jordan Spieth or amateur Paul Dunne (holy smokes Paul Dunne) at the British Open or Mike Trout or U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team or goodness knows the NFL because Jenner decided to tell her story. (Spaceships could be hovering over the Washington Monument and it would not curb coverage of the NFL.)

Jenner is OK with all of that, because she knows—agrees!—this is not about her.

But Jenner said it best:

For the people out there wondering what this is all about—whether it’s about courage or controversy or publicity—well, I’ll tell you what it’s all about. It’s about what happens from here. It’s not just about one person, it’s about thousands of people. It’s not just about me, it’s about all of us accepting one another. We are all different. That’s not a bad thing, that’s a good thing.

That’s what Caitlyn Jenner said last week in public, and with courage. End of story. And a beginning, too.

Write to Jason Gay at [email protected]